Opinion
10-23-00063-CR
06-21-2023
Do not publish
From the 77th District Court Limestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 32534-A
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Johnson, and Justice Smith
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TOM GRAY CHIEF JUSTICE
The legally significant facts and the legal issues in this appeal are not different from those in Ex Parte Thompson, No. 10-22-00162-CR, 2022 Tex.App. LEXIS 7415 (Tex. App.-Waco, Oct. 5, 2022, no pet.) (not designated for publication) and Ex Parte Valero, No. 08-22-00172-CR, 2023 Tex.App. LEXIS 901 (Tex. App.-El Paso, Feb. 13, 2023, pet. granted) (not designated for publication). The parties are familiar with the facts and the issues as argued. Accordingly, there is no need to reiterate them in this memorandum opinion. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4. The issue raised by Eddington in this proceeding is not cognizable via a pretrial application for a writ of habeas corpus. See Ex Parte Valero, 2023 Tex.App. LEXIS 901, *7-10; Ex Parte Thompson, 2022 Tex.App. LEXIS 7415, *8. Accordingly Eddington's sole issue is overruled, and the trial court's order denying Eddington's application for a writ of habeas corpus is affirmed.
Affirmed