SeeDallas v. State , 983 S.W.2d 276, 278 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998), disapproved of on other grounds byEx parte Anderer , 61 S.W.3d 398, 405 & n.33 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 53.02, 54.01, 56.01 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.); Espinosa v. Price , 144 Tex. 121, 188 S.W.2d 576, 577 (1945) ; Ex parte D.W.C. , 1 S.W.3d 896, 897 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1999, pet. denied) ; In re S.L.L. , 906 S.W.2d 190, 193 (Tex. App.—Austin 1993, no writ).SeeIn re B.D.S.D. , 289 S.W.3d 889, 893 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied).
See Dallas v. State, 983 S.W.2d 276, 278 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998), disapproved of on other grounds by Ex parte Anderer, 61 S.W.3d 398, 405 & n.33 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 53.02, 54.01, 56.01 (West, Westlaw through 2017 1st C.S.); Espinosa v. Price, 188 S.W.2d 576, 577 (Tex. 1945); Ex parte D.W.C., 1 S.W.3d 896, 897 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1999, pet. denied); In re S.L.L., 906 S.W.2d 190, 193 (Tex. App.—Austin 1993, no writ). See In re B.D.S.D., 289 S.W.3d 889, 893 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. denied).
The United States and Texas constitutional right-to-bail provisions do not automatically apply to juveniles, as they do to adults. SeeEx parte D.W.C. , 1 S.W.3d 896, 897 (Tex. App.—Beaumont 1999, pet. denied). This is because juvenile law is based on the doctrine of parens patriae —that is, the ideology that minors are subject to the control of their parents and when parental control falters, the State will take on the role of promoting and protecting the juvenile child’s welfare so that the minor’s liberty interest is subject to the State’s parens patriae interest.