From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte D.R.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Dec 19, 2019
No. 02-19-00414-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 19, 2019)

Opinion

No. 02-19-00414-CV

12-19-2019

EX PARTE D.R.


On Appeal from the 362nd District Court Denton County, Texas
Trial Court No. 19-6118-362 Before Gabriel, Kerr, and Birdwell, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a notice of appeal seeking to appeal the trial court's purported order denying expunction.

By letter dated November 13, 2019, we notified the parties of our concern that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the trial court clerk had informed us that the trial judge had not signed a final order in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a), 27.1(a). We requested that the parties submit a copy of the signed order that Appellant seeks to appeal by December 3, 2019, and cautioned that any failure to do so would result in our dismissal of the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f), 44.3, 44.4(a)(2).

While Appellant filed a timely response to our letter, he did not provide us with a copy of the signed order. Instead, Appellant points us to a docket entry in the trial court that states: "Final Hearing on Expunction. State appeared and opposed expunction. Petitioner failed to appear. Denied Expunction. BMc." That docket entry does not constitute an appealable written order. See Ex parte Salim, Nos. 02-19-00009-CR, 02-19-00010-CR, 2019 WL 490516, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 7, 2019, no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) ("[A] docket entry, even one signed by the trial judge, is not an appealable written order."); State v. Cox, 235 S.W.3d 283, 285 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2007, no pet.) ("It is well settled that a docket sheet entry is not an order."); see also In re Bill Heard Chevrolet, Ltd., 209 S.W.3d 311, 315 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, orig. proceeding) ("Docket-sheet entries are inherently unreliable because they lack the formality of orders and judgments.").

Without a signed final order, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we therefore dismiss it. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f); Ex parte J.C., No. 02-18-00169-CV, 2018 WL 4140640, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Aug. 30, 2018, no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal of trial court's "expunction dismissal" where record did not contain a signed final order).

/s/ Lee Gabriel

Lee Gabriel

Justice Delivered: December 19, 2019


Summaries of

Ex parte D.R.

Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth
Dec 19, 2019
No. 02-19-00414-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Ex parte D.R.

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE D.R.

Court:Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

Date published: Dec 19, 2019

Citations

No. 02-19-00414-CV (Tex. App. Dec. 19, 2019)

Citing Cases

Elkins v. State

To the extent that Appellant attempts to appeal an order that does not yet exist, his appeal comes too early,…