Ex Parte Delacruz

Full title: EX PARTE JUAN CORONADO DELACRUZ, Applicant

Court: Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Oct 25, 2006

No. 75,531 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 25, 2006)

Opinion

No. 75,531

Delivered: October 25, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Cause No. 88-407,845 in the 137^th District Court, Lubbock County.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is a post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus forwarded to this Court pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3, et seq. Applicant was convicted of the felony offense of aggravated sexual assault and punishment was assessed at thirty (30) years' confinement. Applicant's appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Delacruz v. State, No. 07-90-00234-CR (Tex.App.-Amarillo, delivered August 28, 1990, no pet.). Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal. The trial court has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law recommending that Applicant be granted an out-of-time appeal. We agree. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04 (j) (2), requires appointed counsel to "represent the defendant until charges are dismissed, the defendant is acquitted, appeals are exhausted, or the attorney is relieved of his duties or replaced by other counsel." The duty to perfect an appeal attaches whether counsel is appointed or retained. See Ex parte Axel, 757 S.W.2d 369 (Tex.Crim.App. 1988). Knowing that Applicant wanted to appeal, counsel had the duty to timely file a motion for new trial or give timely notice of appeal, unless relieved by the trial court or replaced by other counsel. Habeas corpus relief is granted and Applicant is granted an out-of-time appeal from his conviction in cause number 88-407,845 from the 137^th District Court of Lubbock County. The proper remedy in a case such as this is to return Applicant to the point at which he can give notice of appeal. For purposes of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, all time limits shall be calculated as if the conviction had been entered on the day that the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that Applicant, should he desire to prosecute an appeal, must take affirmative steps to see that notice of appeal is given within thirty days after the mandate of this Court has issued.