From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Davis

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Feb 6, 2013
NO. WR-75,876-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 6, 2013)

Opinion

NO. WR-75,018-02

02-06-2013

EX PARTE ERIC LAMOND DAVIS, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 08CR-123 IN THE 349TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HOUSTON COUNTY

Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Davis v. State, No. 06-09-00033-CR (Tex. App. - Texarkana, September 18, 2009, pet. ref'd).

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to communicate to plea offers, of 60 and 70 years' imprisonment to him prior to trial, failed to argue that gunshot residue tests would have showed that the victim committed suicide, and failed to investigate or have Applicant evaluated for competency to stand trial and insanity at the time of the offense.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Davis

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Feb 6, 2013
NO. WR-75,876-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 6, 2013)
Case details for

Ex parte Davis

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ERIC LAMOND DAVIS, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Feb 6, 2013

Citations

NO. WR-75,876-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Feb. 6, 2013)