Opinion
No. 58,823-01 through-05
April 5, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH.
On Applications for Writ of Habeas Corpus in Cause Nos. W91-44763-L, W91-44764-L, W91-44829-L, W97-19561-L, W98-19367-L in Criminal District Court Number Five of Dallas County.
ORDER
These are applications for writ of habeas corpus which were transmitted to this Court pursuant to the provisions of Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07. Applicant was convicted of two counts of sexual assault and three counts of aggravated robbery. Punishment was assessed at confinement for twenty years. No direct appeal was taken. Applicant contends that his pleas are involuntary due to broken plea agreements. More specifically, Applicant alleges that his plea agreements included terms that his federal and state sentences would run concurrently but that they are not running concurrently. On a previous remand in 2004 the trial court entered findings of fact implicitly finding that these sentences are running concurrently with each other. However, that remand order required "findings of fact as to whether the plea bargain agreements included terms that his federal and state sentences would run concurrently; and if so, whether the sentences are, in fact, not running concurrently; and if so, whether the Applicant was ever advised that the trial court had no control over his federal case." Those findings make no reference to whether federal authorities are giving Applicant credit on his federal sentence for time served on these sentences or whether Applicant was informed that federal authorities might not give him that credit. Therefore, it is this Court's opinion that additional facts still need to be developed. The trial court may resolve those issues as set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3 (d), in that it may order affidavits, depositions, or interrogatories from TDCJ and federal authorities, or it may order a hearing. In the appropriate case the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Following receipt of additional information, the trial court shall make further findings of fact as to whether the plea agreements included terms that Applicant's federal and state sentences would run concurrently and, if so, whether the sentences are running concurrently and whether Applicant was ever advised that the trial court had no control over credits on his federal sentence. The trial court shall also make any further findings of fact and conclusions of law it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of the application for writ of habeas corpus. Since this Court does not hear evidence, Ex Parte Rodriquez, 334 S.W.2d 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), this application for a post-conviction writ of habeas corpus will be held in abeyance pending the trial court's compliance with this order. Resolution of the issues shall be accomplished by the trial court within 45 days of the date of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 75 days of the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED.
In the event any continuances are granted, copies of the order granting the continuance shall be provided to this Court.
Any extensions of this time period shall be obtained from this Court.