From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Cathcart

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Oct 18, 2000
32 S.W.3d 338 (Tex. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 04-98-00231-CR.

Delivered and Filed: October 18, 2000.

Original Proceeding from the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas; Trial Court No. 97-W-0066, Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding.

Cynthia Hujar Orr, Goldstein, Goldstein Hilley, San Antonio, for appellant.

Barbara Hervey, Asst. Crim. Dist. Atty., San Antonio, for appellee.

Sitting: HARDBERGER, Chief Justice, and LÓPEZ, Justice, and GREEN, Justice.


OPINION


Previously, we considered Melanie Cathcart's appeal of the trial court's judgment denying her application for writ of habeas corpus. Because we determined that Cathcart was accused of committing the offense of intoxication manslaughter beginning the day she was arrested on October 4, 1996, and because article 32.01 of the Code of Criminal Procedure uses the language "any criminal accusation," we instructed the trial court to enter an order granting habeas relief. In response, the State filed a petition for discretionary review challenging our decision.

Upon consideration of the State's petition, the court of criminal appeals reversed and remanded the cause because Cathcart "was neither held to bail nor illegally restrained in her liberty on the charge of intoxication assault" at the time she filed her application for writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Cathcart, 13 S.W.3d 414, 417 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). The court of criminal appeals explained that because Cathcart "was never arrested for, charged with, or held to bail on intoxication assault" until after she was indicted for intoxication assault — a time subsequent to the filing of her application for writ of habeas corpus, the habeas corpus jurisdiction of the district court was not properly invoked. See Ex parte Cathcart, 13 S.W.3d at 416-17.

The court of appeals has no jurisdiction in a habeas corpus action where the trial court's jurisdiction was not invoked. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.05 (Vernon 1977) (courts of appeals not listed as court with original habeas corpus jurisdiction). As a result, we now dismiss Cathcart's application for want of jurisdiction.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Cathcart

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Oct 18, 2000
32 S.W.3d 338 (Tex. App. 2000)
Case details for

Ex Parte Cathcart

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte Melanie CATHCART, Relator

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Oct 18, 2000

Citations

32 S.W.3d 338 (Tex. App. 2000)

Citing Cases

In re C.G

The appropriate appellate remedy is a dismissal when we have no original jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of…