From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Casselman

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jan 11, 2012
NO. WR-33,157-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 11, 2012)

Opinion

NO. WR-33,157-02

01-11-2012

EX PARTE SCOTTY MURL CASSELMAN, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 8983-A IN THE 132ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM SCURRY COUNTY

Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant entered an open plea of guilty to possession of a controlled substance, and was sentenced to forty years' imprisonment.

Applicant contends, inter alia, that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to advise Applicant of the means of and time line for filing a notice of appeal. Counsel apparently advised Applicant that he would need the trial court's permission to appeal, and that the trial court would be unlikely to grant such permission. However, the record indicates that Applicant filed an open plea of guilty, and therefore retained his right to appeal matters relating to his sentencing. The record does not contain a written waiver of appeal, or anything else to show that Applicant affirmatively waived his appellate rights.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id.

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall first supplement the record with copies of any written waiver of appeal signed by Applicant, and with a transcript of the plea and punishment proceedings. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because Applicant's counsel failed to correctly advise him about his limited right to appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.

Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Casselman

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jan 11, 2012
NO. WR-33,157-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Ex parte Casselman

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE SCOTTY MURL CASSELMAN, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Jan 11, 2012

Citations

NO. WR-33,157-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 11, 2012)