From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Carrisalez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Aug 21, 2013
(Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 21, 2013)

Opinion

08-21-2013

EX PARTE GUILLERMO T. CARRISALEZ, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2005R-0144 IN THE 155TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM AUSTIN COUNTY

Per curiam .

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of intoxication manslaughter and sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because he did not convey a offer for a lesser sentence. He alleges that this failure caused his guilty plea to a greater sentence to be involuntary.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Argent, 393 S.W.3d 781 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance caused Applicant's plea to be involuntary. Specifically, the trial court shall make findings as to whether counsel did not convey a plea offer for fifteen years' imprisonment. If the trial court finds counsel did not pass along this offer and applicant would have accepted the offer, the court shall make specific findings as to whether the prosecution would have withdrawn the offer and whether the trial court would have accepted the offer. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Carrisalez

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Aug 21, 2013
(Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Ex parte Carrisalez

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE GUILLERMO T. CARRISALEZ, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Aug 21, 2013

Citations

(Tex. Crim. App. Aug. 21, 2013)