From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Wooten

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Oct 10, 2012
NO. WR-77,685-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 10, 2012)

Opinion

NO. WR-77,445-02

10-10-2012

EX PARTE DAMACIA D. BUSBY, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 978120 IN THE 185TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of injury to a child and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Busby v. State, No. 01-04-01210-CR (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] del. Mar. 13, 2008).

Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely notify Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and failed to advise him of his right to petition pro se for discretionary review.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Pursuant to Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order appellate counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant's appellate counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed and that he has a right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Wooten

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Oct 10, 2012
NO. WR-77,685-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 10, 2012)
Case details for

Ex parte Wooten

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE PERRY LEE WOOTEN, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Oct 10, 2012

Citations

NO. WR-77,685-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Oct. 10, 2012)