From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Bulger

Supreme Court of California
May 13, 1882
60 Cal. 438 (Cal. 1882)

Opinion

         Application for discharge on writ of habeas corpus.

         COUNSEL

          M. J. Horan, for Petitioner.


         JUDGES: Morrison, C. J.

         OPINION

          MORRISON, Judge

         On the second day of November, 1881, the petitioner, Edward Bulger was convicted in the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco of the crime of " Battery," was sentenced by the Court to three years imprisonment in the House of Correction, and now, after having been confined there for six months, applies to be discharged from further punishment under the judgment of the Superior Court.

         Section 243 of the Penal Code provides that " battery is punishable by fine not exceeding one thousand dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, or by both." The petitioner has been imprisoned for the term of six months and should be discharged.

         It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Ex parte Bulger

Supreme Court of California
May 13, 1882
60 Cal. 438 (Cal. 1882)
Case details for

Ex parte Bulger

Case Details

Full title:Ex parte EDWARD BULGER

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: May 13, 1882

Citations

60 Cal. 438 (Cal. 1882)

Citing Cases

In re Narvaez

During the maximum time for which he was legally committed he would not be entitled to his discharge, but he…

In re Bouchard

Although the judgment was void and the petitioner had served only a part of his term, in other cases, he was…