Ex Parte Brink

3 Citing cases

  1. Winters v. City of Oklahoma City

    1987 OK 63 (Okla. 1987)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that the intentional filing and prosecution of a claim under Oklahoma law that lacked any plausible factual or legal basis constituted a bad faith action and justified the award of sanctions against the attorney

    Judicial personnel of the district courts may be utilized as referees of the Supreme Court. Application of State ex rel. Dept. of Transp., Okla., 646 P.2d 605, 609 [1982] and Ex Parte Brink, 196 Okla. 361, 162 P.2d 604 [1945].State ex rel. Okla.Bar Ass'n v. McNaughton, supra note 12.

  2. McLoud Telephone v. State Bd. of Equalization

    1982 OK 154 (Okla. 1982)   Cited 6 times

    These are: Application of State ex rel. Dept. of Transp., Okla., 646 P.2d 605, 609 [1982] and Ex parte Brink, 196 Okla. 361, 162 P.2d 604 [1945]. "whether the Supreme Court should vacate the Order of the State Board of Equalization, May 19, 1982, assessing Petitioner's property at 26% of its fair cash value for 1982 . . . and

  3. Application of State ex Rel. Dept. of Transp

    1982 OK 36 (Okla. 1982)   Cited 52 times
    Holding federal grants-in-aid are not subject to appropriation under state law without addressing Congressional intent as to state legislative appropriation

    There is precedent for utilizing the district court in this manner. In a 1945 habeas corpus proceeding we cast the district court in the referee's role. Ex parte Brink, 196 Okla. 361, 162 P.2d 604 [1945]. II.