From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex parte Brantner

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 22, 2016
NO. WR-85,194-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 22, 2016)

Opinion

NO. WR-85,194-01

06-22-2016

EX PARTE CARLTON EUGENE BRANTNER, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 15-001-CR-A IN THE 87TH DISTRICT COURT FROM FREESTONE COUNTY

Per curiam. ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of continuous sexual assault of a child and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. The Tenth Court of Appeals dismissed Applicant's appeal for want of jurisdiction. Brantner v. State, No. 10-15-00183-CR (Tex. App.—Waco June 11, 2015)(not designated for publication).

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary because he was misadvised regarding parole eligibility by his counsel.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Moussazadeh, 361 S.W.3d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

It appears that Applicant is represented by counsel. The trial court shall determine whether Applicant is represented by counsel, and if not, whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make specific findings as to whether counsel told Applicant that he would be eligible for parole after serving half of his sentence, despite a conviction for an offense that is parole ineligible. If the court finds counsel gave inaccurate advice as to parole, it should make specific findings as to whether that advice induced Applicant to plead guilty. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court. Filed: June 22, 2016
Do not publish


Summaries of

Ex parte Brantner

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS
Jun 22, 2016
NO. WR-85,194-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 22, 2016)
Case details for

Ex parte Brantner

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE CARLTON EUGENE BRANTNER, Applicant

Court:COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

Date published: Jun 22, 2016

Citations

NO. WR-85,194-01 (Tex. Crim. App. Jun. 22, 2016)