Ex Parte Branch

2 Citing cases

  1. Southern Surety Co. of N.Y. v. Madison

    13 Tenn. App. 657 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1932)   Cited 2 times

    Some authorities have held that the murder of the insured is within the proviso, excepting from the risk, injuries or death resulting from intentional injuries inflicted by the insured or any other person. Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co., 39 S.W. 932; Jarragin v. Travelers Protective Assn., 133 Fed., 892. In the Jarragin case, the insured was killed by a mob while the insured was under arrest.

  2. Freeze v. the Continental Casualty Co.

    5 Tenn. App. 261 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1927)   Cited 8 times

    " Hutson v. Continental Casualty Co., 107 Miss. 520, p. 521. Against these authorities appellant has cited a number of cases, some holding that murder of the insured has been held to be within the proviso excepting from the risk injuries or death resulting from intentional injuries inflicted by insured or any other person, and among which are the cases of Johnson v. Travelers Insurance Co., 39 S.W. 932; Jarragin v. Travelers Protective Association, 133 Fed., 892. In the latter case the insured was killed by a mob while under arrest.