From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Blaylock

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 10, 2007
No. WR-38,113-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 10, 2007)

Opinion

No. WR-38,113-02.

January 10, 2007. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 13,170 in the 115th Judicial District Court from Upshur County.


ORDER

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of delivery of a controlled substance and sentenced to sixty-five years' imprisonment. Applicant contends that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. Although counsel filed a timely motion for a new trial, the notice of appeal was filed after the appellate deadline, and Applicant's appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Blaylock v. State, No. 06-05-00210-CR (Tex.App.-Texarkana, September 23, 2005, no pet.). Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle his to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1997), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide appellate counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether Applicant was denied his right to a meaningful appeal because Applicant's appellate counsel failed to timely file a notice of appeal. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Blaylock

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jan 10, 2007
No. WR-38,113-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 10, 2007)
Case details for

Ex Parte Blaylock

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE ANTRON ROMEL BLAYLOCK, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jan 10, 2007

Citations

No. WR-38,113-02 (Tex. Crim. App. Jan. 10, 2007)