From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ex Parte Adams

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jul 1, 2009
No. WR-69,107-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Jul. 1, 2009)

Opinion

No. WR-69,107-03

Filed: July 1, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

On Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Cause No. 1039218-B in the 177th Judicial District Court from Harris County.


ORDER


Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment. The First Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Adams v. State, No. 01-05-01017-CR (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] November 30, 2006, pet ref'd). Applicant contends, inter alia, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance because counsel failed to interview or subpoena two witnesses, failed to conduct an independent investigation, failed to introduce a 9-1-1 tape, failed to advise Applicant that the original indictment in this case had been dismissed and a new indictment returned, and failed to file a motion to quash the indictment. The trial court entered an order designating issues on September 4, 2008, ordering Applicant's trial counsel to provide an affidavit responding to Applicant's claims. However, apparently because more than six months passed without a response from counsel, the writ was forwarded to this Court without an affidavit from counsel, and without findings of fact and conclusions of law from the trial court. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 608 (1984); Ex parte Lemke, 13 S.W.3d 791,795-96 (Tex.Crim.App. 2000). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex.Crim.App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall provide Applicant's trial counsel with the opportunity to respond to Applicant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court may use any means set out in Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.07, § 3(d). In the appropriate case, the trial court may rely on its personal recollection. Id. If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 26.04. The trial court shall make findings of fact as to whether the performance of Applicant's trial attorney was deficient and, if so, whether counsel's deficient performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant's claim for habeas corpus relief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. If any continuances are granted, a copy of the order granting the continuance shall be sent to this Court. A supplemental transcript containing all affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter's notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court's supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall be returned to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time shall be obtained from this Court.


Summaries of

Ex Parte Adams

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Jul 1, 2009
No. WR-69,107-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Jul. 1, 2009)
Case details for

Ex Parte Adams

Case Details

Full title:EX PARTE DAVE LAMON ADAMS, Applicant

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Jul 1, 2009

Citations

No. WR-69,107-03 (Tex. Crim. App. Jul. 1, 2009)