From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewing v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 15, 1956
286 S.W.2d 938 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)

Opinion

No. 28024.

February 15, 1956.

Appeal from the County Court, Coleman County, Walter K. Boyd, J.

R. E. Murphey, Coleman, Runge, Hardeman, Smith Foy, by Earl W. Smith, San Angelo, for appellant.

Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.


The offense is the possession of whiskey in a dry area, with a prior offense of like character alleged for the purpose of enhancement; the punishment, 30 days in jail and a fine of $500.

Our able State's Attorney had confessed error because of the absence of any proof that the appellant was the same person who was convicted in the prior case plead for enhancement.

Such proof is requisite. Gaines v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 274 S.W.2d 397.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.


Summaries of

Ewing v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Feb 15, 1956
286 S.W.2d 938 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)
Case details for

Ewing v. State

Case Details

Full title:Floyd EWING, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Date published: Feb 15, 1956

Citations

286 S.W.2d 938 (Tex. Crim. App. 1956)

Citing Cases

Gross v. State

In the absence of proof that the appellant was the same person who had been previously convicted, as alleged,…

Bedre v. State

The facts being insufficient to sustain the allegations of prior convictions used to enhance the punishment…