Opinion
No. 11–40512.
2014-02-26
EWING CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff–Appellant v. AMERISURE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant–Appellee.
Lee Howard Shidlofsky (argued), Esq., Douglas Paul Skelley, Esq., Shidlofsky Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Richard Brent Cooper (argued), Esq., Diana L. Faust, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Michelle Elaine Robberson, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Patrick J. Wielinski, Esq., Rene Pinson, Esq., Cokinos, Bosien & Young, P.C., Irving, TX, James Leon Cornell, Jr., Cornell & Pardue, Vincent E. Morgan, Pillsbury WinthropShaw Pittman, Austin, TX, for Defendant–Appellee.
Lee Howard Shidlofsky (argued), Esq., Douglas Paul Skelley, Esq., Shidlofsky Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Richard Brent Cooper (argued), Esq., Diana L. Faust, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Michelle Elaine Robberson, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Patrick J. Wielinski, Esq., Rene Pinson, Esq., Cokinos, Bosien & Young, P.C., Irving, TX, James Leon Cornell, Jr., Cornell & Pardue, Vincent E. Morgan, Pillsbury WinthropShaw Pittman, Austin, TX, for Defendant–Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas.
Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Consistent with the January 17, 2014 Texas Supreme Court opinion and response to our certified question, we VACATE the judgment of the district court granting summary judgment to defendant, Amerisure Insurance Co. (Amerisure), on grounds that coverage was excluded under its contractual liability exclusion. We REMAND the case to the district court for further proceedings, reserving to the parties any claims, defenses, and arguments other than those related to the contractual liability exclusion.
Ewing Const. Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 12–0661, 420 S.W.3d 30, 57 Tex. Sup.Ct. J. 195 (Tex. Jan. 17, 2014).
Ewing Construction Co., Inc. v. Amerisure Ins. Co., 690 F.3d 628, 633 (5th Cir.2012).
VACATED AND REMANDED.