From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewers v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 17, 2024
3:23-CV-752-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-CV-752-RJC-DCK

01-17-2024

MATTHEW EWERS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.


ORDER

DAVID C. KEESLER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 8) filed by Leonard A. Bennett, concerning Drew D. Sarrett, on January 17, 2024. Drew D. Sarrett seeks to appear as counsel pro hac vice for Plaintiff. Upon review and consideration of the motion, which was accompanied by submission of the necessary fee and information, the Court will grant the motion.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that in accordance with Local Rule 83.1, the “Motion For Admission Pro Hac Vice and Affidavit” (Document No. 8) is GRANTED. Drew D. Sarrett is hereby admitted pro hac vice to represent Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ewers v. Bank of Am.

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jan 17, 2024
3:23-CV-752-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Ewers v. Bank of Am.

Case Details

Full title:MATTHEW EWERS, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Jan 17, 2024

Citations

3:23-CV-752-RJC-DCK (W.D.N.C. Jan. 17, 2024)