Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:06-cv-01035.
June 13, 2008
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Pending before the Court is Petitioner's § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Docket 1]. By Standing Order entered August 1, 2006, and filed in this case on December 11, 2006, this action was referred to Magistrate Judge Mary E. Stanley for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation (PF R) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). The magistrate judge submitted her PF R [Docket 12] on March 5, 2008, recommending that this Court deny the petition as moot and dismiss the case.
The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In this case, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and Rules 6(e) and 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, objections to the PF R were due by March 21, 2008. To date, no objections have been filed.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the PF R [Docket 11] in its entirety, DENIES AS MOOT Petitioner's § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Docket 1], and DISMISSES the case from the Court's active docket. A Judgment Order will enter this day implementing the rulings contained herein.