From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ewalan v. Wash. State Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 22, 2023
No. C20-5678JLR (W.D. Wash. Feb. 22, 2023)

Opinion

C20-5678JLR

02-22-2023

JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JAMES L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the court are Plaintiff Joseph Lochuch Ewalan's motions (1) to order the Department of Corrections (“DOC”) to transport Mr. Ewalan (Transport Mot. (Dkt. # 126)); (2) for leave to file additional evidence (Evid. Mot. (Dkt. # 127)); and (3) for a preliminary or permanent injunction against prison secretary Cheryl Strange (Inj. Mot. (Dkt. # 128)). Mr. Ewalan, who has proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis throughout this litigation, filed each of these motions on his own behalf. (See Dkt.) The court appointed pro bono counsel, Brennen Johnson, to represent Mr. Ewalan on February 16, 2023, per this District's Pro Bono Plan. (See 2/16/23 Order (Dkt. # 125) (citing General Order No. 16-20, Section 4(b) (Dec. 8, 2020)).) In that order, the court directed Mr. Johnson to either file a motion for relief from appointment immediately if he was unable to accept the appointment or enter a Notice of Appearance by March 1, 2023. (Id. at 2.)

In light of the court's order appointing Mr. Johnson to represent Mr. Ewalan, the court DENIES without prejudice Mr. Ewalan's motions (1) to order DOC to transport Mr. Ewalan (Dkt. # 126), (2) for leave to file additional evidence (Dkt. # 127), and (3) for a preliminary or permanent injunction against prison secretary Cheryl Strange (Dkt. # 128). Mr. Johnson may refile these motions on Mr. Ewalan's behalf, if at all. Alternatively, if Mr. Johnson is relieved from appointment, Mr. Ewalan may refile the motions, if at all, on his own behalf after such relief is granted.

The court cautions Mr. Ewalan that once he is represented by counsel, he may not appear, file motions, or otherwise act on his own behalf without leave of the court. See, e.g., U.S. v. Bergman, 813 F.2d 1027, 1030 (9th Cir. 1987) (finding “no error” in district court's refusal to acknowledge pro se filings by a represented party); see also Local Rules W.D. Wash. LCR 83.2(b)(5) (forbidding a party represented by an attorney from acting on its own behalf).


Summaries of

Ewalan v. Wash. State Dep't of Corr.

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Feb 22, 2023
No. C20-5678JLR (W.D. Wash. Feb. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Ewalan v. Wash. State Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH LOCHUCH EWALAN, Plaintiff, v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Feb 22, 2023

Citations

No. C20-5678JLR (W.D. Wash. Feb. 22, 2023)