E.W. Smith Agency, Inc., v. Sanger

1 Citing case

  1. Couch v. Difco Lab, Inc.

    44 Mich. App. 44 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972)   Cited 14 times
    Finding that by establishing a profit-sharing plan, defendant-company offered to make certain payments for the benefit of its salaried employees who continued to render their services

    The penalty imposed on Couch has no such immediate and overwhelming impact. See E W Smith Agency Inc v. Sanger, 350 Mich. 75 (1957). The Legislature has chosen to bar only agreements which prevent an employee from engaging in other employment.