Evey v. State

3 Citing cases

  1. Randall v. State

    474 N.E.2d 76 (Ind. 1985)   Cited 22 times

    Defendant shows no basis for reversible error on this issue. See White v. State, (1982) Ind., 433 N.E.2d 761; Evey v. State, (1981) 275 Ind. 674, 419 N.E.2d 971. VI, VII, and VIII

  2. Johnson v. State

    472 N.E.2d 892 (Ind. 1985)   Cited 90 times
    Holding that a defendant has no constitutional right to challenge the search or seizure of property belonging to a third party, even if the search was without probable cause

    Her independent basis for the in-court identification was sufficiently established without reference to the pretrial lineup, whether or not the lineup was impermissibly suggestive. White v. State, (1982) Ind., 433 N.E.2d 761; Hill v. State, (1982) Ind., 442 N.E.2d 1049; Evey v. State, (1981) 275 Ind. 674, 419 N.E.2d 971. Accordingly, Defendant has shown no error on this issue.

  3. Harris v. State

    427 N.E.2d 658 (Ind. 1981)   Cited 43 times
    Holding habitual offender charge filed day of trial not error where defendant did not "request a continuance in order to prepare to meet the allegations of the amended information"

    Although appellant moved to suppress this testimony prior to the time it was offered to the jury, the law clearly requires an additional objection when the identification testimony is offered as evidence. Evey v. State, (1981) Ind., 419 N.E.2d 971; Duvall v. State, (1981) Ind., 415 N.E.2d 718; Drake v. State, (1979) Ind., 397 N.E.2d 600; Stowers v. State, (1977) 266 Ind. 403, 363 N.E.2d 978. Thus the issue is not preserved for review. We hold the trial court did not err in permitting the identification of the appellant.