From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Everson v. Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 2006
635 S.E.2d 592 (N.C. 2006)

Opinion

No. 146P06-2

17 August 2006


ORDER

"Defendant's Motion for Request for Determination Under Rule 34 is Allowed. Plaintiff-Petitioner's Pro Se Petition for Writ of Certiorari is denied pursuant to Rule 34 of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure as a frivolous filing. Plaintiff-Petitioner is no longer allowed to file pro se in this civil matter before the Court. Any future filing in this matter by Plaintiff-Petitioner which is not accompanied by a certification signed by a licensed North Carolina attorney, who is in good standing with the North Carolina State Bar, verifying Plaintiff-Petitioner's claims are of merit and not frivolous, will not be processed.

Furthermore, pursuant to Rule 34, we remand this matter to Rockingham County for a hearing to determine sanctions, if appropriate. By order of the Court in conference, this the 17th day of August 2006.


Summaries of

Everson v. Wright

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 2006
635 S.E.2d 592 (N.C. 2006)
Case details for

Everson v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:DAVID K. EVERSON, and PATRICIA M. EVERSON v. DOUGLAS E. WRIGHT

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

635 S.E.2d 592 (N.C. 2006)