From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Everlight Elecs. Co. v. Nichia Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 5, 2014
Civil Action No.12-cv-11758 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 5, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No.12-cv-11758

11-05-2014

EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and EMCORE CORPORATION, Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants, v. NICHIA CORPORATION, and NICHIA AMERICA CORPORATION, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs, v. EVERLIGHT AMERICAS, INC., Defendant.



ORDER GRANTING NICHIA'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY [#375]

Presently before the Court is Nichia's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply, filed on September 22, 2014. The motion is fully briefed and for the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Nichia's motion.

The filing of a sur-reply is appropriate when new evidence relevant to a party's summary judgment motion becomes available after the completion of summary judgment briefing. Mauer v. Deloitte & Touche, LLP, 752 F.Supp. 2d 819, 824-25 (S.D. Ohio 2010); Nolan LLC c. TDC Int'l Corp., No. 06-14907, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 47445, *4-5 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 5, 2009). Additionally, Rule 56(c) precludes the consideration of new evidence and argument in a summary judgment reply brief without providing the non-moving party adequate opportunity to respond. Eng'g & Mfg. Servs., LLC v. Ashton, 387 F. App'x 575, 583 (6th Cir. 2010); Seay v. Tenn. Valley Auth., 339 F.3d 454, 480-82 (6th Cir. 2003).

Here, Nichia has established good cause for granting its requested relief. Nichia should be permitted to bring the testimony of Mr. Bernd Kammerer, President and COO of Everlight Americas and CEO of Everlight Europe, to the attention of the Court because it is relevant to the issue of injunctive relief. The Court rejects Everlight's arguments that Nichia had this evidence long before summary judgment briefing began and that Nichia has not been diligent in the prosecution of this case. Additionally, the Court agrees with Nichia that a sur-reply is required with respect to the issues concerning the terms "white" and "white light" and marking, given that Everlight raised new arguments and evidence in its reply brief, and not, typical "rebuttal evidence" as it claims.

Accordingly, Nichia's Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply [#375] is GRANTED.

SO ORDERED. Dated: November 5, 2014

/s/Gershwin A Drain

GERSHWIN A. DRAIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Everlight Elecs. Co. v. Nichia Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Nov 5, 2014
Civil Action No.12-cv-11758 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Everlight Elecs. Co. v. Nichia Corp.

Case Details

Full title:EVERLIGHT ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., and EMCORE CORPORATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 5, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No.12-cv-11758 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 5, 2014)