From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Everhome Mtge. Co. v. Aber

Court of Appeals of New York
Nov 17, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6540 (N.Y. 2022)

Opinion

No. 85

11-17-2022

Everhome Mortgage Company, Appellant, v. Nuchem Aber et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Mikelle V. Bliss, for appellant. Anthony R. Filosa, for respondents.


Mikelle V. Bliss, for appellant.

Anthony R. Filosa, for respondents.

MEMORANDUM

The Appellate Division order should be affirmed, with costs.

In this foreclosure action, defendant Equity Recovery Corporation (Equity) established that the statute of limitations began to run on April 30, 2009, when plaintiff commenced the first action to foreclose the mortgage (see Albertina Realty Co. v Rosbro Realty Corp., 258 NY 472, 476 [1932]; Freedom Mortgage Corp. v Engel, 37 N.Y.3d 1, 22-23 [2021]). That first action was dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiff's failure to appear for a court conference. Plaintiff did not commence this second foreclosure action until June 24, 2015, more than six years after acceleration of the debt (see CPLR 213 [4]). We agree with the Appellate Division that plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition to Equity's motion for, among other things, dismissal of the amended complaint as time-barred and for summary judgment on its counterclaim pursuant to RPAPL article 15 (195 A.D.3d 682, 689 [2d Dept 2021]).

Order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Acting Chief Judge Cannataro and Judges Rivera, Garcia, Wilson, Singas and Troutman concur.


Summaries of

Everhome Mtge. Co. v. Aber

Court of Appeals of New York
Nov 17, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6540 (N.Y. 2022)
Case details for

Everhome Mtge. Co. v. Aber

Case Details

Full title:Everhome Mortgage Company, Appellant, v. Nuchem Aber et al., Respondents…

Court:Court of Appeals of New York

Date published: Nov 17, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6540 (N.Y. 2022)

Citing Cases

Robert v. Azoulay Realty Corp.

A motion to renew must be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion, with a reasonable…

MTGLQ Inv'rs v. Rodgers

A mortgage foreclosure action is subject to a six-year statute of limitations (see CPLR213[4]). "With respect…