A motion for leave to renew "shall be based upon new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination or shall demonstrate that there has been a change in the law that would change the prior determination" (CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; Everhome Mortg. Co. v. Aber, 195 A.D.3d 695, 695, 145 N.Y.S.3d 396, 397), and "shall contain reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion" (CPLR 2221 [e][3]; Hart v. City of New York, 5 A.D.3d 438, 772 N.Y.S.2d 574, 575). The new fact that Risen Christ relies upon on its motion to renew is Ms. Barnes' statement in her affidavit that Risen Christ never bought in a non-Lutheran minister to preform services at the subject property.