From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Everett v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
1:10-cv-00741-AWI-SMS-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)

Opinion

1:10-cv-00741-AWI-SMS-HC.

September 22, 2011


ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME (DOC. 31) ORDER DEEMING PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS TO HAVE BEEN TIMELY FILED (DOC. 32)


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

Pursuant to the Court's order of September 1, 2011, Petitioner's objections to the findings and recommendations filed on June 27, 2011, were due on September 15, 2011.

On September 16, 2011, Petitioner filed a motion for a short extension of time to file the objections, which were subsequently filed on September 20, 2011.

Good cause appearing, Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file objections is GRANTED, and Petitioner's objections filed on September 20, 2011, are DEEMED to have been timely filed. IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Everett v. Yates

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 22, 2011
1:10-cv-00741-AWI-SMS-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Everett v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:RONALD EVERETT, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 22, 2011

Citations

1:10-cv-00741-AWI-SMS-HC (E.D. Cal. Sep. 22, 2011)