From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Everett v. Montano

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2018
165 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)

Opinion

7223 [M–2458] Ind. 2364/16 OP 151/18

10-02-2018

In re Damen EVERETT, Petitioner, v. Hon. Armando MONTANO, JSC, etc., et al., Respondents.

Damen Everett, petitioner pro se. Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola, II of counsel), for Hon. Armando Montano, respondent. Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kyle R. Silverstein of counsel), for District Attorney, respondent.


Damen Everett, petitioner pro se.

Barbara D. Underwood, Attorney General, New York (Angel M. Guardiola, II of counsel), for Hon. Armando Montano, respondent.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Kyle R. Silverstein of counsel), for District Attorney, respondent.

Renwick, J.P., Gische, Kahn, Kern, Moulton, JJ.

The above-named petitioner having presented an application to this Court praying for an order, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules,

Now, upon reading and filing the papers in said proceeding, and due deliberation having been had thereon,

It is unanimously ordered that the application be and the same hereby is denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements.


Summaries of

Everett v. Montano

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Oct 2, 2018
165 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
Case details for

Everett v. Montano

Case Details

Full title:In re Damen Everett, Petitioner, v. Hon. Armando Montano, JSC, etc., et…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Oct 2, 2018

Citations

165 A.D.3d 429 (N.Y. App. Div. 2018)
165 A.D.3d 429
2018 N.Y. Slip Op. 6504