From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eveready Insurance Company v. DeLeon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 2001
287 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Argued September 17, 2001.

October 15, 2001.

In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify its insured in an underlying personal injury action entitled Downes v. DeLeon, pending in Supreme Court, Queens County, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated April 5, 2001, which denied its cross motion for summary judgment and granted the respective motion and cross motion of the defendants Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company and Kenneth Rodriguez for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff is obligated to defend and indemnify its insured in the underlying action.

Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success, N.Y. (Joel A. Sweetbaum and Marshall D. Sweetbaum of counsel), for appellant.

Agen Stenz, Woodbury, N.Y. (John A. Asta of counsel), for respondent Kenneth Rodriguez.

Peter J. Creedon, Garden City, N.Y. (James J. Toomey, Jr., and Jeena R. Belil of counsel), for respondent Travelers Property Casualty Insurance Company.

Before: LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, P.J., DANIEL F. LUCIANO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the respondents' respective motion and cross motion are denied, the plaintiff's cross motion is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the appellant is not obligated to defend or indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action.

Contrary to the Supreme Court's determination, the appellant properly and timely mailed the notice of disclaimer to the attorney of record for the plaintiff in the underlying action despite information that the plaintiff had retained new counsel. Because the appellant was not in receipt of a duly-executed consent to change attorney form or court order substituting counsel in accordance with CPLR 321, it was proper to mail the notice of disclaimer to the attorney of record (see, Moustakas v. Bouloukos, 112 A.D.2d 981; see also, Candeloro v. Candeloro, 133 A.D.2d 731).

Since this is a declaratory judgment action, the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the appellant is not obligated to defend or indemnify its insured in the underlying personal injury action (see, Lanza v. Wagner, 11 N.Y.2d 317, 334, appeal dismissed 371 U.S. 74, cert denied 371 U.S. 901).

BRACKEN, P.J., LUCIANO, FEUERSTEIN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Eveready Insurance Company v. DeLeon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 15, 2001
287 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

Eveready Insurance Company v. DeLeon

Case Details

Full title:EVEREADY INSURANCE COMPANY, appellant, v. NELSON E. DeLEON, ET AL.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 15, 2001

Citations

287 A.D.2d 536 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
731 N.Y.S.2d 642

Citing Cases

In re Brooklyn Hosp. Ctr.

New York courts have strictly interpreted § 321(b)(1) to require both filing with the court and notice to all…

Farage v. Ehrenberg

An affirmative discharge of an attorney by the client is immediate. By contrast, from the standpoint of…