Opinion
Argued and Submitted, Seattle, Washington November 8, 2013
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 32.1)
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00923-MJP, D.C. No. 2:07-cv-00923-MJP. Marsha J. Pechman, Chief District Judge, Presiding.
For EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company (12-35783), Plaintiff - Appellee: Laurie D. Kohli, Porter Kohli, P.S., Seatle, WA.
For AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., a foreign insurance company (12-35783), Plaintiff - Appellee: Jacquelyn A. Beatty, Attorney, Barbara Brady, Attorney, KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL, Seattle, WA.
For WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company (12-35783), Defendant: David P. Hansen, Attorney, William A. Olson, Attorney, Aiken, St. Louis & Siljeg, P.S., Seattle, WA; Thomas M. Jones, Esquire, Attorney, Melissa O'Loughlin White, Attorney, COZEN O'CONNOR, Seattle, WA.
For ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, also known as Royal Insurance Company, ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, individually and as asuccessor to Royal Insurance Company of America aka Royal Insurance Company (12-35783), Defendants: Russell Charles Love, Esquire, THORSRUD CANE & PAULICH, Seattle, WA.
For NORTHWEST TOWER CRANE SERVICE INC (12-35783), Defendant: David P. Hansen, Attorney, William A. Olson, Attorney, Aiken, St. Louis & Siljeg, P.S., Seattle, WA.
For EVANSTON INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company (12-35798), Plaintiff: Laurie D. Kohli, Porter Kohli, P.S., Seatle, WA.
For AMERICAN GUARANTEE & LIABILITY INSURANCE CO., a foreign insurance company (12-35798), Plaintiff - Appellant: Jacquelyn A. Beatty, Attorney, Barbara Brady, Attorney, KARR TUTTLE CAMPBELL, Seattle, WA.
For ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a foreign insurance company, individually and as asuccessor to Royal Insurance Company of America aka Royal Insurance Company (12-35798), Defendant - Appellee: Russell Charles Love, Esquire, THORSRUD CANE & PAULICH, Seattle, WA.
For WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign insurance company (12-35798), Defendant - Appellee: David P. Hansen, Attorney, William A. Olson, Attorney, Aiken, St. Louis & Siljeg, P.S., Seattle, WA.
Before: SCHROEDER, PAEZ, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
This is the third time this case has been before our court. It is a dispute between insurance carriers arising out of a crane accident at a construction site. In a previous memorandum disposition, we held that there was a contract requiring Northwest Tower Crane to provide excess insurance for Bellevue Master, the general contractor. Evanston Ins. Co. v. Westchester Surplus Lines Ins. Co., 451 Fed.Appx. 672 (9th Cir. 2011). On remand, Royal Indemnity contended that its excess insurance was excess to all of Bellevue Master's insurance. While the district court was not correct in stating that our prior mandate precluded Royal's argument, the argument should have been raised earlier in the litigation and has therefore been waived. See In re Cellular 101, Inc., 539 F.3d 1150, 1155 (9th Cir. 2008).
In the cross-appeal, American Guarantee seeks attorney's fees, claiming that under Washington law it is equitably subrogated to the rights of Bellevue Master. Bellevue Master, however, was fully compensated by its own insurers, and American Guarantee is seeking reimbursement from Royal and Westchester Surplus Lines, who are insurers by virtue of a third party's policies. The district court was correct in ruling that American Guarantee was not entitled to recover attorney fees from Royal and Westchester. See Trinity Universal Ins. Co. of Kansas v. Ohio Cas. Ins. Co., 176 Wn.App. 185, 312 P.3d 976, 2013 WL 4562718, at *11 (Wash. Ct.App. 2013).
AFFIRMED.