From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. State

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 17, 2005
Nos. C 05-0029 MMC, (Docket Nos. 2, 4 5) (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2005)

Opinion

Nos. C 05-0029 MMC, (Docket Nos. 2, 4 5).

May 17, 2005


ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


Alonzo Evans, a California parolee, filed this pro se civil rights actions, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against the State of California on January 3, 2005. The allegations in the instant complaint are duplicative of the allegations in a complaint filed by plaintiff earlier on the same day. See Evans v. State of California, No. C 05-0028 MMC (PR). A complaint that merely repeats pending or previously litigated claims may be dismissed sua sponte. . See Cato v. United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n. 2 (9th Cir. 1995); Bailey v. Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir. 1988). Moreover, the claims in plaintiff's earlier case have been dismissed for failing to state a cognizable claim for relief. For the reasons set forth in the order dismissing the earlier case, the claims in the instant action likewise are not cognizable.

Accordingly, the above-titled action is hereby DISMISSED. The application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED, and the request for appointment of counsel is DENIED. The Clerk shall close the file and terminate Docket Nos. 2, 4 and 5.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Evans v. State

United States District Court, N.D. California
May 17, 2005
Nos. C 05-0029 MMC, (Docket Nos. 2, 4 5) (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2005)
Case details for

Evans v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO EVANS, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California

Date published: May 17, 2005

Citations

Nos. C 05-0029 MMC, (Docket Nos. 2, 4 5) (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2005)