From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. State

COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Jun 21, 2016
No. 1129 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Jun. 21, 2016)

Opinion

No. 1129

06-21-2016

TONY EVANS v. STATE OF MARYLAND


UNREPORTED

Krauser, C.J., Nazarian, Moylan, Charles E., Jr. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ. PER CURIAM *This is an unreported opinion, and it may not be cited in any paper, brief, motion, or other document filed in this Court or any other Maryland Court as either precedent within the rule of stare decisis or as persuasive authority. Md. Rule 1-104.

Tony Evans, appellant, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court for Baltimore City granting the appellee's motion for summary judgment and its dismissal of his petition for judicial review. The petition was filed after the Office of the State's Attorney for Baltimore City (the "agency") failed to satisfy appellant's request for information he was seeking under the Maryland Public Information Act. We have thoroughly reviewed the record and find no error. Evan's petition for judicial review was filed more than thirty days after he was informed of the agency's inability to produce the documents he was seeking and, thus the petition was untimely. See Maryland Rule 7-203 (a petition for judicial review shall be filed within 30 days of the agency's action). Moreover, summary judgment was properly granted because there was no factual dispute that the agency could not produce the documents because they had shredded them in accordance with the agency's internal retention policy.

JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY AFFIRMED. COSTS TO BE PAID BY APPELLANT.


Summaries of

Evans v. State

COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND
Jun 21, 2016
No. 1129 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Jun. 21, 2016)
Case details for

Evans v. State

Case Details

Full title:TONY EVANS v. STATE OF MARYLAND

Court:COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS OF MARYLAND

Date published: Jun 21, 2016

Citations

No. 1129 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. Jun. 21, 2016)