From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-0292 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-0292 WBS JFM (PC).

August 15, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 22, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint. On March 8, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion styled as a motion for preliminary injunction but which seeks no specific injunctive relief from the court. On May 2, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion styled as a motion for a three judge court.

In all three motions, plaintiff continues to contend that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation lacks jurisdiction to keep him in custody. That contention has been found to be without merit, and the claim raised by plaintiff in this action which rested thereon has been dismissed. See Findings and Recommendations filed March 30, 2010, at 3-4; Order filed May 5, 2010. Plaintiff's motions will be denied.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's December 22, 2010 motion to amend his complaint is denied;

2. Plaintiff's March 8, 2011 motion is denied; and

3. Plaintiff's May 2, 2011 motion is denied.

DATED: August 12, 2011.


Summaries of

Evans v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 15, 2011
No. 2:09-cv-0292 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2011)
Case details for

Evans v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:JAMES EVANS, JR., Plaintiff, v. D. K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 15, 2011

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-0292 WBS JFM (PC) (E.D. Cal. Aug. 15, 2011)