From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Precythe

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 22, 2019
568 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

WD 81826

01-22-2019

Sterling EVANS, Appellant, v. Ann PRECYTHE and Matthew Pierce, Respondents.

Sterling M. Evans, Bonne Terre, appellant pro se. Peter Houser, Jefferson City for respondents.


Sterling M. Evans, Bonne Terre, appellant pro se.

Peter Houser, Jefferson City for respondents.

Before Division Two: Alok Ahuja, P.J., and Thomas H. Newton and Mark D. Pfeiffer, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

In May 2014, Appellant Sterling Evans was an inmate at the Farmington Correctional Center. He was investigated for alleged misconduct, which resulted in prison discipline, but no criminal charges. Evans filed a petition for expungement of the records of the prison misconduct investigation pursuant to § 610.122, RSMo. The circuit court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, because Evans did not seek expungement of the sort of "records of arrest" addressed in § 610.122, RSMo, and because he was ineligible for expungement because he had been previously convicted of a felony. Evans appeals. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Evans v. Precythe

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Jan 22, 2019
568 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

Evans v. Precythe

Case Details

Full title:Sterling EVANS, Appellant, v. Ann PRECYTHE and Matthew Pierce, Respondents.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Jan 22, 2019

Citations

568 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)