From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evans v. Office of Compliance

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 14, 2016
2016-1444 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2016)

Opinion

2016-1444

11-14-2016

KEVIN EVANS, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent

CHARLES ELLIOT WAGNER, Silver Spring, MD, argued for petitioner. JOHN UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by HILLARY BENSON.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Petition for review of a decision of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance in Nos. 13-CP-23, 13-CP-61, 14-CP-18.

JUDGMENT

CHARLES ELLIOT WAGNER, Silver Spring, MD, argued for petitioner. JOHN UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel, Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by HILLARY BENSON. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 14, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Evans v. Office of Compliance

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 14, 2016
2016-1444 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Evans v. Office of Compliance

Case Details

Full title:KEVIN EVANS, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 2016

Citations

2016-1444 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 14, 2016)