Opinion
1:21-cv-00093-DAD-BAM (PC)
11-15-2021
DAVID EVANS, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN, et al., Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' SECOND MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (ECF NO. 22)
BARBARA A. MCAULIFFE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
Plaintiff David Evans (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Guerra, Jolly, and Lopez (“Defendants”) for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and against Defendant Guerra for sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
On August 12, 2021, Defendants Guerra, Jolly, and Lopez submitted waivers of service of summons. (ECF No. 19.) Following an extension of time, Defendants' responsive pleadings were due on or before November 12, 2021. (ECF Nos. 20, 21.)
Currently before the Court is Defendants' motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file a response to the complaint, filed November 12, 2021. (ECF No. 22.) Although Plaintiff has not had an opportunity to respond to Defendants' motion, the Court finds a response unnecessary. Local Rule 230(1).
A declaration of counsel filed in support of the request largely reiterates the reasoning provided in support of Defendants' first request for extension of time, stating that additional time is needed to review Plaintiff's central file, medical records, and appeal packages, some of which were received on July 29, 2021 and are substantial in length. (ECF No. 22, p. 4.) The task of reviewing all of these records must be balanced against defense counsel's existing caseload and previously set deadlines in other cases. Counsel requests a thirty-day extension of time, up to and including December 13, 2021, to review Plaintiff's records, determine a course of action, prepare and file Defendants' response to Plaintiff's complaint, and to balance completing this task with counsel's duties and responsibilities in the other cases to which he is assigned. (Id.)
Having considered the request, the Court finds good cause to modify the briefing schedule in this matter. Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b). The Court further finds that Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the extension of time requested here.
Accordingly, Defendants' second motion for an extension of time to file a response to the complaint, (ECF No. 22), is HEREBY GRANTED. Defendants shall file a response to the complaint on or before December 13, 2021.
IT IS SO ORDERED.