From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Evangelista v. Dashow

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Oct 6, 2023
3:22-cv-00144-JMK (D. Alaska Oct. 6, 2023)

Opinion

3:22-cv-00144-JMK

10-06-2023

LEVI C. EVANGELISTA, Plaintiff, v. JASON E. DASHOW, CHRISTINA DUBE, and ROBERT LAWRENCE, Defendants.


ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS

JOSHUA M. KINDRED UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On September 28, 2023, Defendant Robert Lawrence filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6).Plaintiff must serve and file any opposition to the motion to dismiss as provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules, and Court orders. The following sets out the legal standards applicable to a motion to dismiss.

Docket 34.

Under Rule 12(b)(6), a defendant may move to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. To determine whether a complaint states a valid claim for relief, a court considers whether the complaint contains sufficient factual matter that, if accepted as true, “state[s] a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.”In conducting its review, a court must liberally construe a self-represented plaintiff's complaint and give the plaintiff the benefit of the doubt.The Court resolves a motion under 12(b)(6) by evaluating only the complaint before it; therefore, no additional evidence should be filed to support the complaint when responding to a motion to dismiss.

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (citing Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). In making this determination, a court may consider “materials that are submitted with and attached to the Complaint.” United States v. Corinthian Colleges, 655 F.3d 984, 999 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing Lee v. L.A., 250 F.3d 668, 688 (9th Cir. 2001)).

See Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th Cir. 2010) (citing Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F.2d 1026, 1027 n.1 (9th Cir. 1985) (en banc)).

A plaintiff has the right to respond to a motion to dismiss. A failure to respond to a motion to dismiss could be deemed as an admission that the motion is well-taken, result in a summary ruling, and end the case as to that defendant.

See generally Local Civil Rule 7.1(h).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff has 21 days from the date of this order to file with the Court any opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. A copy of the opposition must also be served each Defendant, or on any attorney that has appeared on behalf of a Defendant in this action. See Rule 5, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 2. Defendant has 14 days after service of Plaintiff's opposition to serve and file an optional reply. 3 3. At all times, Plaintiffs shall keep the Court informed of any change of address. Such notice shall be titled “Notice of Change of Address.”The notice shall contain only information about the change of address, and its effective date. The notice shall not include requests for any other relief. A Notice of Change of Address form, PS23, may be obtained from the Clerk of Court, if needed.


Summaries of

Evangelista v. Dashow

United States District Court, District of Alaska
Oct 6, 2023
3:22-cv-00144-JMK (D. Alaska Oct. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Evangelista v. Dashow

Case Details

Full title:LEVI C. EVANGELISTA, Plaintiff, v. JASON E. DASHOW, CHRISTINA DUBE, and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Alaska

Date published: Oct 6, 2023

Citations

3:22-cv-00144-JMK (D. Alaska Oct. 6, 2023)