From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eva v. O'Fallon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Sep 10, 2018
CV 18-32-BU-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Sep. 10, 2018)

Opinion

CV 18-32-BU-DLC-JCL

09-10-2018

RAYMOND JOSEPH EVA, Plaintiff, v. DAN O'FALLON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA, Defendants.


ORDER

United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered his Order and Findings and Recommendations on June 7, 2018, recommending to deny Plaintiff Raymond Joseph Eva's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) for lack of merit and to deny a certificate of appealability. (Doc. 5.) Eva failed to timely object to the Findings and Recommendations, and so waived the right to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). This Court reviews for clear error those findings and recommendations to which no party objects. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-53 (1985). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made." Wash. Mut., Inc. v. United States, 856 F.3d 711, 721 (9th Cir. 2017) (citation omitted).

Having reviewed the Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 5), the Court finds no clear error in Judge Lynch's conclusion that Eva's Petition should be denied because Eva failed to state a claim for injuries cognizable under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. "[I]t is not the province of the federal habeas court to reexamine state court determinations on state law questions." Estelle v. McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991). Eva does not allege a violation of federally protected rights but rather that the state court erred as a matter of state law in revoking his sentence. Nor did Judge Lynch clearly err in recommending that a certificate of appealability be denied, as Eva has made no "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

(1) Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation (Doc. 5) is ADOPTED IN FULL.

(2) Eva's petition (Doc. 1) is DENIED.

(3) A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

(4) The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of the Respondent and against the Petitioner.

DATED this 10th day of September, 2018.

/s/_________

Dana L. Christensen, Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Eva v. O'Fallon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION
Sep 10, 2018
CV 18-32-BU-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Sep. 10, 2018)
Case details for

Eva v. O'Fallon

Case Details

Full title:RAYMOND JOSEPH EVA, Plaintiff, v. DAN O'FALLON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BUTTE DIVISION

Date published: Sep 10, 2018

Citations

CV 18-32-BU-DLC-JCL (D. Mont. Sep. 10, 2018)