From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eustice v. Paysafe Payment Processing Sols.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 13, 2022
09-21-0 0 282 -CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2022)

Opinion

09-21-0 0 282 -CV

01-13-2022

CHRISTOPHER D. EUSTICE, Appellant v. PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC, Appellee


Submitted on December 28, 2021

On Appeal from the 457th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 20-03-04135-CV

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Johnson, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

Christopher D. Eustice appealed from a final judgment, signed on September 1, 2021. But after that, Eustice failed to file the brief assigning a claim of error to the judgment that he appealed. After Eustice failed to meet the deadline for filing his brief, the Court, through the Clerk, notified him that his brief was past due. The Court also warned him that we would dismiss his appeal if he failed to file a brief or asked for an extension of time to do so on or before November 22, 2021. See Tex.R.App.P. 38.8(a)(1).

On December 7, 2021, the Court notified the parties that on December 28, 2021, the Court had submitted the appeal on the record without any briefs. By failing to comply with the Court's instructions, Eustice failed to prosecute his appeal. For the reasons explained above, Eustice's appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex.R.App.P. 42.3(b); id. 43.2(f).

APPEAL DISMISSED.


Summaries of

Eustice v. Paysafe Payment Processing Sols.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont
Jan 13, 2022
09-21-0 0 282 -CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2022)
Case details for

Eustice v. Paysafe Payment Processing Sols.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER D. EUSTICE, Appellant v. PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Ninth District, Beaumont

Date published: Jan 13, 2022

Citations

09-21-0 0 282 -CV (Tex. App. Jan. 13, 2022)