Opinion
Case No. CV 16-5936 JLS (SS)
12-22-2016
RONAL DOUEIL EUSTACHE, Petitioner, v. SANDRA D. ANDERSON, Chief Counsel for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, et al., Respondents.
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and Petitioner's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and adopts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
After the Report and Recommendation issued, Petitioner filed (1) a "Motion Requesting Summary Judgment" (Dkt. No. 9); (2) a "Rule 59(e) Motion to Alter or Amend Judgement" (Dkt. No. 10); (3) a Request "To Have This Tort Claim Filed In Abeyance" (Dkt. No. 11); and (4) a "Declaration of Truth" (Dkt. No. 12). These documents either assert objections to the Report and Recommendation or to re-argue points raised in the Petition. The Court accordingly construes these documents as Petitioner's Objections. --------
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: 12/22/16
/s/_________
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE