From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eurodif S.A. v. U.S.

U.S. Court of International Trade
Aug 3, 2006
442 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

Opinion

Slip Op. 06-124. Court No. 02-00219.

August 3, 2006.

Before: POGUE, WALLACH, and EATON, Judges.


JUDGMENT


On May 18, 2006, we remanded the captioned case to the Department of Commerce ("Commerce") to exclude low enriched uranium enriched under so-called separative work unit contracts from the scope of the antidumping duty order. See Eurodif S.A. v. United States, 30 CIT ___,___, Slip. Op. 06-76 (May 18, 2006). Commerce has since filed a remand determination; the parties have commented thereon. Upon review of that determination, and the parties' comments and rebuttals thereto, we find that Commerce has complied with our remand order. We understand the parties' technical comments on the language of the order and the certification that importers will have to complete upon the entry of low enriched uranium. These technical objections, however, would be better addressed in the context of a concrete dispute over a specific entry. Cf. Nat'l Park Hospitality Ass'n v. DOI, 538 U.S. 803, 812 (2003); 19 C.F.R. § 351.225 (outlining the procedure for "scope" determinations). Therefore, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the Department of Commerce's remand determination is sustained.


Summaries of

Eurodif S.A. v. U.S.

U.S. Court of International Trade
Aug 3, 2006
442 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)
Case details for

Eurodif S.A. v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:EURODIF S.A., Compagnie Générale Des Matières Nucléaires and Cogema, Inc.…

Court:U.S. Court of International Trade

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

442 F. Supp. 2d 1367 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2006)

Citing Cases

USEC Inc. v. United States

IIBackground This case comes before the court after consolidated decisions before a three-judge panel, the…

Eurodif v. U.S.

On this second remand, Commerce redefined the scope of the antidumping order to exclude any entry of LEU that…