See, e.g., Eures v. Havenpark Mgmt., LLC, No. 23-184, 2024 WL 1374766 (S.D. Ind. Apr. 1, 2024) (noting that courts throughout the country have consistently held that the 2022 Committee Note does not allow parties to withhold the names of their members simply because those members prefer that their information remain private) (citations omitted); Mayer v. Patriot Pickle Inc., No. 23-1299, 2024 WL 162881, at *5 (W.D.N.Y. Jan. 16, 2024) (recognizing the public's right of access to court documents to deny defendant's request to file Rule 7.1 statement under seal and finding that movant failed to explain how disclosure of the information would protect privacy interests or any details about the privacy interests at stake); Mann v. Trails Carolina, LLC, No. 23-20, 2023 WL 5109564, at *2 (W.D. N.C. Aug. 9, 2023) (avoiding issue of whether substantial interest in privacy was satisfied by stated need to ensure safety of its members and/or employees and avoid potentially threatening communications because defendant failed to particularize those concerns); Driver Opportunity Partners, LP v