Opinion
2019-1560 W C
08-27-2020
Wedge EUGENE, Appellant, v. Joseph ARMATO, Sr., Doing Business as Global Realty Development, and 40 North Street, LLC, Respondents.
Wedge Eugene, appellant pro se. Andrew M. Romano, Esq., for respondents (no brief filed).
Wedge Eugene, appellant pro se.
Andrew M. Romano, Esq., for respondents (no brief filed).
PRESENT: BRUCE E. TOLBERT, J.P., THOMAS A. ADAMS, JERRY GARGUILO, JJ.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified by increasing the award in favor of plaintiff on her cause of action against defendant 40 North Street, LLC to the principal sum of $2,200; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
In this small claims action, insofar as is relevant to this appeal, plaintiff seeks to recover $2,200 from her former landlord, 40 North Street, LLC, representing the return of her security deposit, and $2,200 from Joseph Armato, Sr., doing business as Global Realty Development, for the refund of a broker's fee she had paid in connection with her 2017 lease with 40 North Street, LLC. After a nonjury trial, the City Court determined that plaintiff was not entitled to a refund of the broker's fee and that, with regard to the security deposit, "[m]ost of the damage claimed by defendant as damage that plaintiff is responsible for, is really just normal rejuvenation of the unit for the new tenant which defendant is responsible for." The court awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,500 on her cause of action against defendant 40 North Street, LLC, without explaining why plaintiff was not awarded the full amount of her security deposit, and implicitly dismissed plaintiff's cause of action against defendant Joseph Armato, Sr., doing business as Global Realty Development.
In a small claims action, our review is limited to a determination of whether "substantial justice has ... been done between the parties according to the rules and principles of substantive law" ( UCCA 1807 ; see UCCA 1804 ; Ross v. Friedman , 269 A.D.2d 584 [2000] ; Williams v. Roper , 269 A.D.2d 125 [2000] ).
In determining that "most" of the damage claimed by 40 North Street, LLC in support of its retention of plaintiff's security deposit was normal wear and tear, the City Court did not identify any specific damage for which plaintiff would be liable. Moreover, the record does not support the court's determination that 40 North Street, LLC was entitled to retain $700 of plaintiff's security deposit, as there is no proof of the reasonable cost to repair the alleged damage (see UCCA 1804 ). Thus, substantial justice (see UCCA 1804, 1807 ) requires that plaintiff's award on her cause of action against defendant 40 North Street, LLC for the return of her security deposit be increased from $1,500 to $2,200.
There is no merit to the legal argument advanced by plaintiff to support her claim that she is entitled to recover the broker's fee (see Voo Doo Contr. Corp. v. L & J Plumbing & Heating Co. , 264 AD2d 361 [1999] ; Krasnoff v. J. Tuman Assoc., Inc. , 63 Misc. 3d 148[A], 2019 NY Slip Op. 50703[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2019] ). Consequently, we do not disturb the court's implicit dismissal of the cause of action against defendant Joseph Armato, Sr., doing business as Global Realty Development.
Accordingly, the judgment is modified by increasing the award in favor of plaintiff on her cause of action against defendant 40 North Street, LLC to the principal sum of $2,200.
TOLBERT, J.P., ADAMS and GARGUILO, JJ., concur.