Opinion
Nos. 34848 and 34849
Decided October 3, 1956.
Supreme Court — Dismissals — No debatable constitutional question involved — Appropriation of property — Assessment of compensation — Section 19, Article I, Constitution — Probability of change in current zoning — Equity — Jurisdiction — Chapter 719, Revised Code — Due process — Sections 1 and 16, Article I, Constitution — Section 1, Article XIV, Amendments, U.S. Constitution.
APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.
Mr. Paul H. Torbet, director of law, and Mr. Perry L. Grahum, for appellee.
Messrs. Thompson, Hine Flory, Mr. Charles W. Sellers and Mr. David C. Prugh, for appellants.
It is ordered and adjudged that these appeals as of right be, and the same hereby are, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.
Appeals dismissed.
WEYGANDT, C.J., MATTHIAS, HART, ZIMMERMAN, STEWART, BELL and TAFT, JJ., concur.