From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eubanks v. Wal-Mart Stores E., L.P.

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Feb 21, 2024
Civil Action 3:24-cv-00005-TES (M.D. Ga. Feb. 21, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 3:24-cv-00005-TES

02-21-2024

BECKY L. EUBANKS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WALMART, INC., Defendants.


CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER

Honorable Tillman Self U.S. District Court Judge.

By agreement of the parties, for good cause, and pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c), the Court finds that a protective order should be entered for the purpose of protecting (1) confidential and proprietary commercial information and trade secrets of Defendant and of all other Wal-Mart entities, and (2) personal identifying information, personal health information, and other sensitive or private information concerning Defendant's employees, vendors, and customers who are not parties to this litigation.

1.

This protective order shall apply to documents and things marked "CONFIDENTIAL" prior to production by the producing party in this matter, as well as to any deposition testimony concerning such documents and things.

2.

All such documents, tilings, and testimony marked "CONFIDENTIAL" pursuant to Paragraph 1 above shall be used only in the course of the above-captioned proceedings, or in any renewal action; and shall not be used, or provided for use, in any other litigation or proceedings, or published (orally, electronically, or by any other means) to any person, except as designated herein.

3.

Any counsel of record in this action may disclose protected materials and information to their employees to whom it is necessary that the material be disclosed for purposes of this litigation. The counsel making such a disclosure must ensure that the individual has read a copy of this Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its provisions.

4.

Before receiving access to any materials or information within the scope of this Order, any person not employed by a party or its counsel, including consulting or testifying experts, shall execute a "Written Assurance" in the form contained in Exhibit A, attached hereto. All parties and their respective counsel who permit access to Protected Documents to such a person shall retain each such executed "Written Assurance" and shall keep a list identifying all persons described in this paragraph to whom protected documents have been disclosed.

5.

Any party contesting whether or not a document or thing should be marked "CONFIDENTIAL" will notify the producing party, via counsel and in writing, and will specify the materials or information for which the protected status is disputed. The parties will have ten (10) business days after receipt of the aforementioned notice to resolve the dispute without Court intervention. If they i are not able to resolve the dispute within this time, the party contesting the "CONFIDENTIAL" designation shall request leave of Court, to submit the materials or information at issue under seal for an in-camera inspection and final decision by the Court as to whether or not the materials or information at issue will retain protected status under this Order.

6.

Each party agrees that before filing with tire Clerk of Court any document or thing which discloses, directly or indirectly, all or part of any materials or information described in paragraph 1 above, the party shall request leave of Court to file such materials under seal.

7.

After the final termination of this action, the restrictions on communication and disclosure provided for herein shall continue to be binding upon the parties, their respective counsel, and upon all other persons to whom protected materials or information have been communicated or disclosed pursuant to this Order or to any other order of this Court.

8.

It is understood that if any person knowingly violates this Protective Order, said person shall pay such penalties to the producing party as the Court deems appropriate, including any attorneys' fees or expenses associated with the prosecution of said violation, and any other sanctions that the Court finds appropriate under the circumstances.

SO ORDERED.

EXHIBIT "A"

WRITTEN ASSURANCE

AFFIDAVIT OF ____ (printed name), being duly sworn and personally appearing before the undersigned attesting officer, duly authorized by law to administer oaths, deposes and says that the within statements are true and correct:

1.

I have read the Consent Protective Order attached hereto and I understand its terms and meanings.

2.

I agree that my signature below submits me to the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, in which the above-styled matter is pending, and binds me to the provisions of the Consent Protective Order, including to all promises undertaken in the Order, as if originally agreed to by me.

FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.


Summaries of

Eubanks v. Wal-Mart Stores E., L.P.

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Feb 21, 2024
Civil Action 3:24-cv-00005-TES (M.D. Ga. Feb. 21, 2024)
Case details for

Eubanks v. Wal-Mart Stores E., L.P.

Case Details

Full title:BECKY L. EUBANKS, Plaintiff, v. WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP and WALMART…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Feb 21, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 3:24-cv-00005-TES (M.D. Ga. Feb. 21, 2024)