From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Eubanks v. Bickle

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 13, 2001
36 S.W.3d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77877

February 13, 2001

APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HON. MICHAEL B. CALVIN, JUDGE.

Stephen J. Nangle, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jerry Crowder, St. Louis, MO, Robert A. Wulff, St. Louis, MO, for respondent.

Before: Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and Mary Rhodes Russell and Richard B. Teitelman, JJ.

ORDER



Ruth B. Eubanks and James M. Eubanks (collectively referred to as Plaintiffs) appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Ida Bickle on Plaintiffs' claim for personal injuries and premise liability. Plaintiffs contend the trial court erred in 1) determining Plaintiffs' response to Ms. Bickle's motion for summary judgment failed to conform with Rule 74.04(c)(2) and 2) granting Ms. Bickle's motion for summary judgment because she failed to negate genuine issues of material fact.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Eubanks v. Bickle

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 13, 2001
36 S.W.3d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Eubanks v. Bickle

Case Details

Full title:RUTH B. EUBANKS and JAMES M. EUBANKS, Plaintiffs/Appellants v. IDA BICKLE…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 13, 2001

Citations

36 S.W.3d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)