From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Etter v. Bibby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2011
Civil Action: 10-cv-00557-JLK-CBS (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action: 10-cv-00557-JLK-CBS

08-29-2011

JOHANNA ETTER, and ARTHUR ETTER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES KING BIBBY JR., M.D., TIMOTHY CARTER MEILNER, M.D., and DELTA COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL DISTRICT, Defendants.

Counsel: Christopher W. Ford John J. Astuno, Jr. David M. Jones Kim B. Childs Paul A. Faraci


Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer


FTR - Reporter Deck-Courtroom A402

Courtroom Deputy: Laura Galera
Counsel:

Christopher W. Ford

John J. Astuno, Jr.

David M. Jones

Kim B. Childs

Paul A. Faraci

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER

HEARING: MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 1:58 p.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Argument regarding Joint Defense Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplemental Expert Disclosures [50]
and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Documents from Defendant Delta County Memorial Hospital
District [52].
ORDERED: Joint Defense Motion to Strike Plaintiffs' Supplemental Expert Disclosures [50] is

GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is denied to the extent

the motion seeks to strike the supplemental expert disclosures in their entirety and

granted to the extent that the parties are given alternative remedies as stated on the

record.
ORDERED: Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Documents from Defendant Delta County Memorial

Hospital District [52] is TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. The court will issue a

written order.
ORDERED: Dr. Todd and Dr. Jobin are to prepare supplemental reports that comply with

Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(b). Those reports must be signed and explain the basis for

their opinions and identify the materials they considered in formulating their

opinions. Once those supplemental reports are prepared, defendants may then move

to reopen the depositions. Plaintiffs may challenge the motion to reopen the

depositions.
ORDERED: To the extent that plaintiffs intend to limit Dr. Grayck's opinions of her medical

records, no further disclosure is necessary. To the extent that plaintiffs

wish to go beyond the scope of Dr. Grayck's medical records, the court will no

longer treat Dr. Grayck as a treating physician, and Dr. Grayck will be required to

prepare a written report that complies with Fed.R.Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(b). Dr. Grayck

will be required to sign the report, which shall be prepared at either Dr. Grayck's or

the plaintiff's expense. The defendant may depose Dr. Grayck on her opinions, and

that deposition shall go forward in all respects, with the plaintiff bearing the cost

of the court reporter and Dr. Grayck's fees.

HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 4:37 p.m.
Total time in court: 02:39
To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303)
825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.


Summaries of

Etter v. Bibby

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Aug 29, 2011
Civil Action: 10-cv-00557-JLK-CBS (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Etter v. Bibby

Case Details

Full title:JOHANNA ETTER, and ARTHUR ETTER, Plaintiffs, v. CHARLES KING BIBBY JR.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 29, 2011

Citations

Civil Action: 10-cv-00557-JLK-CBS (D. Colo. Aug. 29, 2011)