From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Etteldorf v. Yellow Cab Transfer Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
May 1, 1945
18 N.W.2d 330 (Wis. 1945)

Opinion

March 12, 1945. —

May 1, 1945.

APPEAL from an order of the circuit court for Dane county: HERMAN W. SACHTJEN, Circuit Judge. Affirmed.

For the appellants there was a brief by Schubring, Ryan, Petersen Sutherland of Madison, and oral argument by Robert J. Sutherland.

For the respondent there was a brief by Hill, Beckwith Harrington of Madison, and oral argument by D. V. W. Beckwith.


Personal injury, summary judgment. This action was begun on July 30, 1943, by Lois Etteldorf, plaintiff, against Yellow Cab Transfer Company and its insurance carrier, London Lancashire Insurance Company, Limited, to recover damages sustained by the plaintiff in a fall from a moving cab due to the sudden opening of the door.

The defendants answered and upon the pleadings and affidavits filed moved for summary judgment. The plaintiff filed affidavits in opposition to the motion.

The matter was brought on for a hearing, and the court entered an order on October 4, 1944, denying the motion for summary judgment, from which the defendants appeal.


The trial court found that there was an issue of fact as to which the plaintiff was entitled to a jury trial. We have examined the pleadings and the affidavits filed by the parties and it is our conclusion that the trial court was correct in its determination. In view of the fact that the case must be tried, we have refrained from making comment on the evidentiary facts.

Order affirmed.


Summaries of

Etteldorf v. Yellow Cab Transfer Co.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin
May 1, 1945
18 N.W.2d 330 (Wis. 1945)
Case details for

Etteldorf v. Yellow Cab Transfer Co.

Case Details

Full title:ETTELDORF, Respondent, vs. YELLOW CAB TRANSFER COMPANY and another…

Court:Supreme Court of Wisconsin

Date published: May 1, 1945

Citations

18 N.W.2d 330 (Wis. 1945)
18 N.W.2d 330

Citing Cases

Hanson v. Halvorson

The summary-judgment statute is sec. 270.635. The general principles governing denial of such a judgment are…