From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Etienne v. Huntington Ingalls Indus.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Oct 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-3011 (UNA) (D.D.C. Oct. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-3011 (UNA)

10-28-2022

DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE, Plaintiff, v. HUNTER INGALLS INDUSTRIES, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application and for the following reasons, will dismiss the complaint without prejudice.

A pro se litigant's pleading is held to less stringent standards than would be applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F.Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court's jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense, and to determine whether the doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Plaintiff purports to bring a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against a private corporation and, it appears, three of its officers, who allegedly have caused a multitude of harms, including attempted murder, stalking, property damage, and violations of rights protected under the First and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution. There are few factual allegations, however, and what factual allegations there are, taken together, are not sufficient to put defendants on notice of the claims against them.

As drafted, plaintiff's complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8(a). Therefore, the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. An Order is issued separately.


Summaries of

Etienne v. Huntington Ingalls Indus.

United States District Court, District of Columbia
Oct 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-3011 (UNA) (D.D.C. Oct. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Etienne v. Huntington Ingalls Indus.

Case Details

Full title:DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE, Plaintiff, v. HUNTER INGALLS INDUSTRIES, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, District of Columbia

Date published: Oct 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-3011 (UNA) (D.D.C. Oct. 28, 2022)